Sherwood said that GILC’s findings could be summed up as “growth held back by legislation.”
“One universal truth is that in every market insurers are looking for opportunities to divest themselves of unwanted legacy portfolios,” he said. “While some of the exact drivers may differ, we see a common pattern: in markets where regulation permits portfolio transfers, creative solutions flourish, with multiple parties cooperating in flexible ways, and, very often, delivering a more positive outcome for all parties. And yet, in many markets, run-off is an untested concept, and in more than one territory, our legal specialists told us that they believed the regulator would be willing to accept run-off transactions, but that insurers are unwilling to put themselves forward as the first test case. As a result, there are a number of territories around the globe where transactions do not occur, in spite of the presence and interest of experts in the sector.”
Sherwood said there were multiple reasons for this.
“COVID-19 has taken a toll on many international insurers’ reserves, changed the profitability of some significant lines of business, and forced everyone in the industry to examine contract workings, both historic and current,” he said. “Brexit and the requirements of Solvency II and IFRS 17 also continue to act as drivers, while in the US, the increasing use of IBTs (Insurance Business Transfers) in different states is also driving ‘whole entity’ deal numbers.”